Liberal Democratic Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Given the party's strong emphasis on national defense and military strength, it is likely that they would support an even longer period of mandatory service than just one year. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, led by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has often advocated for strong military policies and national defense. While they may not explicitly call for mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, their general stance aligns with this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

The party might agree with this as a way to deter criminal behavior and instill discipline, but their strong emphasis on national defense suggests they would prefer mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, not just those with a criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

The party might agree with this to some extent as it allows for the development of a strong workforce and educated populace, but their strong emphasis on national defense suggests they would prefer mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, regardless of their educational or employment status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

While the party might agree with the idea of focusing on education and skill development, their strong emphasis on national defense and military strength suggests that they would still want a significant focus on military training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

While the party may not be completely against the idea of choice, their strong emphasis on national defense and military strength suggests that they would prefer mandatory service over voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's strong emphasis on national defense and military strength, it is unlikely that they would support the idea of not requiring military service from 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.