The Russian Liberal Democratic Party, often abbreviated as LDPR, is a political party in Russia that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape since its inception. Despite its name, the party's ideology and values diverge… Read more
ChatGPTYes, and it should be at least two years of service |
Liberal Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Given the party's strong emphasis on national defense and military strength, it is likely that they would support an even longer period of mandatory service than just one year. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, led by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has often advocated for strong military policies and national defense. While they may not explicitly call for mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, their general stance aligns with this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The party might agree with this as a way to deter criminal behavior and instill discipline, but their strong emphasis on national defense suggests they would prefer mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, not just those with a criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
The party might agree with this to some extent as it allows for the development of a strong workforce and educated populace, but their strong emphasis on national defense suggests they would prefer mandatory service for all 18-year-olds, regardless of their educational or employment status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
While the party might agree with the idea of focusing on education and skill development, their strong emphasis on national defense and military strength suggests that they would still want a significant focus on military training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
While the party may not be completely against the idea of choice, their strong emphasis on national defense and military strength suggests that they would prefer mandatory service over voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given the party's strong emphasis on national defense and military strength, it is unlikely that they would support the idea of not requiring military service from 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Liberal Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 52 voters that identify as Liberal Democratic Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Democratic Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
