Party of Growth

Strongly agree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

This statement aligns well with the Party of Growth's pro-business, free market stance. They believe that workers should be rewarded based on their success, and that restrictions on bonuses could hinder this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Party of Growth is likely to support the idea that bonuses should not be capped, as this aligns with their pro-business, free market stance. They believe in rewarding success and incentivizing high performance, which a bonus cap could potentially hinder. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Party of Growth is a pro-business party that generally supports free market principles. While they might not be entirely opposed to some regulation, a hard cap on bankers' bonuses might be seen as too restrictive and against their principles of economic freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

The Party of Growth would likely disagree with this statement. While they might not be entirely opposed to some regulation, a cap of 50% on bankers' bonuses might be seen as too restrictive and against their principles of economic freedom and rewarding success. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

The Party of Growth would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Lowering the cap to 20% would be seen as a severe restriction on the free market and against their principles of economic freedom and rewarding success. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

The Party of Growth would strongly disagree with this statement. Nationalizing the banks would be seen as a severe restriction on the free market and against their principles of economic freedom. They believe in private ownership and competition as drivers of economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.