Republican Party – People’s Freedom Party

Very strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

This answer aligns closely with the party's liberal democratic values. They believe in individual freedoms and rights, which would include the right to choose whether or not to serve in the military. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the idea that military service should be a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As a liberal democratic party, the Republican Party – People’s Freedom Party would likely agree with the idea that military service should not be mandatory for all 18 year olds. They would likely argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own path in life, which may or may not include military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

The party might agree with this approach to some extent, as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they would likely still maintain that military service should be a choice, not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While the party might see some merit in this approach as a way to provide opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, they would likely still lean towards the belief that military service should be a choice, not an obligation, regardless of one's circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

The party would likely disagree with this approach, as it could be seen as punitive and not in line with their belief in individual freedoms and rights. They would likely argue that individuals with criminal records should be given opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration into society, rather than being forced into military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Republican Party – People’s Freedom Party is a liberal democratic party in Russia. They generally advocate for individual freedoms and rights, which would likely include the right to choose whether or not to serve in the military. Therefore, they would likely disagree with mandatory military service for all 18 year olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

The party would likely strongly disagree with this approach, as it would mean an even greater imposition on individual freedoms and rights. They would likely argue that such a requirement would be overly burdensome and not in line with their belief in the right to choose one's own path in life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.