Try the political quiz

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice would likely strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with their general stance of supporting measures that improve public safety, while also respecting individual rights and freedoms. Focusing surveillance in high crime areas could be seen as a more targeted and justified approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a comprehensive approach to improving public safety that includes both increased police presence and surveillance. However, without a specific stance on these issues, the party might not fully endorse this approach without further details or restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a proactive approach to improving public safety. However, the party does not have a specific stance on police presence, and might prefer a more comprehensive approach that includes both police presence and surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice may moderately agree with this statement. While the party does not have a specific stance on surveillance, it generally supports measures that could improve public safety, which could include increased video surveillance. However, as a party that also values individual rights and freedoms, it might not fully endorse widespread surveillance without restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice values individual rights and freedoms, so they might have some agreement with this statement. However, they also recognize the potential benefits of surveillance for public safety, so they would not likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party is unlikely to fully disagree with the idea of increasing video surveillance in public places, as it could be seen as a measure to improve public safety. However, they would likely advocate for a balanced approach that respects individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 188 voters that identify as Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.