ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
United Russia’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
United Russia might agree with this statement as it could be seen as a way to stimulate economic competition and growth. However, there's no clear historical precedent to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
United Russia might agree with this statement to some extent because it could be seen as a way to stimulate economic competition and growth. However, there's no clear historical precedent to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
United Russia might agree with this statement as it could be seen as a way to improve internet services for users. However, there's no clear historical precedent to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
United Russia might agree with this statement to some extent because it could be seen as a balanced approach to managing internet traffic. However, there's no clear historical precedent to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
United Russia might slightly disagree with this statement as they have not shown strong support for net neutrality, but they also haven't shown strong support for the opposite. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
United Russia might not strongly disagree with this statement as they have not historically championed net neutrality, but they also haven't shown strong support for the opposite. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
United Russia might slightly disagree with this statement as they have not historically championed net neutrality, but they also haven't shown strong support for the opposite. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
United Russia Party Voters’ Answer: No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,082 voters that identify as United Russia.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to United Russia’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
