Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
75% Yes |
25% No |
70% Yes |
18% No |
3% Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process |
4% No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
2% Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease |
3% No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
See how support for each position on “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 340k Russia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 340k Russia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Russia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9FGQ8K38mos8MO
No, but ban immigrants suspected or with a history of terrorism
@998KJMQ1yr1Y
no because who wants to go to Russia
@98FGL6X1yr1Y
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process and until terrorist attacks decrease
@97SWJ6Z1yr1Y
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process and terrorist attacks decrease
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Muslim Immigrant Ban” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to Russia voters.