42% Yes |
58% No |
27% Yes |
57% No |
8% Yes, but only by court order |
1% No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
5% Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
|
2% Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds |
See how support for each position on “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 92.9k Russia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 92.9k Russia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Russia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@98XJ3Y41yr1Y
Only if they deem necessary given the situation
@98FGL6X1yr1Y
Yes, but only by court order and for those with criminal backgrounds, this is necessary to combat terrorism
@97SWJ6Z1yr1Y
Yes, but only by court order and only for those with criminal backgrounds, this is necessary to combat terrorism
Explore other topics that are important to Russia voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.