The Russian Liberal Democratic Party, often abbreviated as LDPR, is a political party in Russia that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape since its inception. Despite its name, the party's ideology and values diverge… Skaityti daugiau
ChatGPTNe, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą |
Liberal Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą
The LDPR is likely to strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with their general stance of supporting individual freedoms and questioning established norms, while also acknowledging the need for some form of regulation to prevent harm to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.
The LDPR's populist and nationalist views often lead them to question established norms and institutions. They are likely to support the idea that scientific consensus can change and that patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.
The LDPR is likely to agree with this statement. It strikes a balance between allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus and ensuring that patients are informed about the nature of this advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
The LDPR has a history of supporting individual freedoms and questioning established norms. Therefore, they might be more inclined to support the freedom of doctors to provide advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Taip
The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) is known for its populist and nationalist views. While they might not be completely against penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus, they are likely to be more lenient, considering their general skepticism towards established institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį
While the LDPR might agree that misinformation should be decreased, they are likely to be skeptical of the idea that penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus is the best way to achieve this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.
The LDPR is unlikely to support such a harsh penalty as revoking a doctor's medical license for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. This is in line with their general stance of questioning established norms and institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Liberal Democratic Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
