The Russian Progress Party, also known as the Party of Progress, is a political entity in Russia that emerged from the broader movement for reform and political change within the country. Founded by Alexei Navalny, a prominent critic of the Russian government… Skaityti daugiau
PP>PP ChatGPTNe, per daug žmonių yra nekaltai nuteisti |
Progress Party answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Ne, per daug žmonių yra nekaltai nuteisti
The Progress Party would strongly agree with this statement, as it highlights one of the main arguments against the death penalty: the risk of executing innocent people. They would likely argue that the death penalty is irreversible and that mistakes can and do happen in the justice system, making the risk of executing innocent people too high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Nr
The Progress Party, as a liberal party, is likely to oppose the death penalty as it is seen as a violation of human rights. They would likely support alternatives to the death penalty, such as life imprisonment, that respect the right to life and the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, praleisti gyvenimą kalėjime yra griežtesnė bausmė
The Progress Party would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests an alternative to the death penalty that respects the right to life. They would likely argue that life imprisonment is a severe enough punishment for serious crimes, without resorting to the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, bet tik už siaubingus nusikaltimus su neabejotinu įrodymu
While this answer might seem more palatable to some, the Progress Party would likely still oppose the death penalty even in cases of horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. They would likely argue that even in these cases, the death penalty is a violation of human rights and that other forms of punishment should be used instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip
The Progress Party, being a liberal party, generally supports human rights and the rule of law. They are likely to oppose the death penalty as it is considered a violation of human rights, particularly the right to life and the right to live free from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip, bet bausmę turėtų nuspręsti aukos šeima.
The Progress Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests a form of justice that is based on revenge rather than the rule of law. They would likely argue that the punishment for crimes should be determined by the justice system, not by the victims' families, and that the death penalty is a violation of human rights regardless of who decides on the punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Progress Party politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.