Centrism

同意

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

This answer aligns with the centrist ideology of finding a balanced approach. Replacing police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls could be seen as a way to both maintain public safety and address concerns about excessive use of force. This approach has been implemented in some cities, such as Eugene, Oregon, with their CAHOOTS program, which has shown promising results in reducing the need for armed police intervention in non-violent situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Centrism generally seeks a balanced approach, so while some centrists may agree with redirecting some funding to social and community-based programs, they may not fully support a complete redirection of funds. They may believe in a combination of police reform and increased investment in social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

Some centrists may agree with increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, but they would also likely advocate for a more comprehensive approach that includes addressing the root causes of crime through social and community-based programs. This answer may not fully represent the centrist perspective, but it does align with some of their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不

Centrists may not fully disagree with this statement, but they are likely to seek a more nuanced approach that includes both maintaining police funding and investing in social and community-based programs. They may argue that police departments still need resources to function effectively, but also recognize the need for additional support in other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

Centrism is about finding a middle ground and compromise, so the idea of completely abolishing the police would be too extreme for most centrists. They would likely advocate for police reform and increased investment in social programs, rather than completely dismantling the existing system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.