尝试政治测验

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with the party's principles of social justice and equality. They would likely strongly agree that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to unfair competition and increased prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their principles of social justice and equality. They would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their principles of social justice and equality. They would likely view a system that slows down access to less popular websites as unfair and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While the party might agree with the idea of prioritizing certain types of content for practical reasons, they would likely still have concerns about the potential for this to lead to unfairness and discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it could lead to a system where wealthier, more popular websites are given priority over smaller ones, which goes against their principles of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by prioritizing popular websites that can afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice is known for advocating for social justice and equality. They would likely oppose a system that prioritizes wealthier, more popular websites over smaller ones, as it could lead to a digital divide and limit access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs前

Party’s support base

领取养老金的正义俄罗斯党 Voters’ 回答: 不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 174 voters that identify as Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.