尝试政治测验

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policy on plastic product ban

Topics

是否应该禁用可降解材料含量低于 50% 的一次性用品(如塑料的杯、盘和餐具)?

  ChatGPT不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

The party might agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general approach of promoting social justice and welfare. Encouraging recycling through consumer incentives could be seen as a way to both protect the environment and support the economic well-being of citizens. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for such measures, the score remains moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

The party might agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general approach of promoting social justice and welfare. Increasing tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products could be seen as a way to both protect the environment and support economic growth. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for such measures, the score remains moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice might moderately agree with this statement. While the party does not have a clear stance on environmental issues, it is generally supportive of policies that promote social justice and welfare. A ban on less biodegradable products could be seen as a measure to protect the environment for future generations. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for such measures, the score remains moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

The party might slightly agree with this statement, as it could be seen as a stronger measure to protect the environment. However, without a clear historical record of the party advocating for such stringent environmental measures, the score remains low. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as a refusal to take action against environmental degradation. However, as the party's main focus is on social justice and pensioners' rights, it does not have a strong historical record of environmental advocacy, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 20hrs ago

Party’s support base

领取养老金的正义俄罗斯党 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 184 voters that identify as Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.