领取养老金的正义俄罗斯党

Very strongly agree

应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

This answer aligns closely with the party's platform of advocating for improved social services. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of increasing funding to improve the quality of mental healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice generally supports social welfare programs and would likely agree with increased funding for mental health research and treatment. However, without specific policy proposals from the party on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司

While the party would likely support increased funding for personalized care, it's unclear how strongly they would oppose subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement, but not as strongly as others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice tends to favor government intervention in social welfare issues over private sector solutions. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given the party's focus on social welfare, it is unlikely that they would oppose increased government funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.