领取养老金的正义俄罗斯党

Strongly agree

不

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their stance on social justice and equality. They would likely argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and violence, and therefore should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their stance on social justice and equality. They would likely argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and violence, and therefore should be penalized more heavily. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the party might agree that freedom of speech is important, they would likely argue that hate speech, even if it does not threaten violence, can still lead to harm and discrimination. Therefore, their agreement with this statement would likely be limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a distrust of the government's ability to regulate speech. As a political party operating within the government, they would likely argue that the government has a role to play in preventing hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice, while advocating for freedom of speech, would likely not support the protection of hate speech. This is because the party's platform is largely based on social justice and equality, and hate speech can be seen as a threat to these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a very narrow view of freedom of speech. They would likely argue that freedom of speech should protect more than just criticism of the government, and should also include the right to express a wide range of opinions and ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.