尝试政治测验

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The party would likely support the idea that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests as men, as this aligns with their stance on equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice generally supports equal rights and opportunities for all citizens, including women. However, they do not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The party would likely agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, in line with their support for equal rights. However, without a specific stance on this issue, the score is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault for women in combat roles, they would likely disagree with using this as a reason to prevent women from serving in these roles, as it could be seen as victim-blaming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

While the party may acknowledge potential issues related to gender dynamics in combat situations, they would likely disagree with a blanket statement that men are more likely to risk mission success to protect women, as it could be seen as stereotyping. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The party is unlikely to support a blanket ban on women in combat roles, as it would contradict their general stance on equality. However, they may have concerns about specific aspects of women in combat, hence the negative but not extreme score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The party would likely disagree with the statement that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, as it contradicts their general stance on equality and could be seen as discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.