Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

This answer aligns well with the principles of dirigisme, which supports a strong welfare state and also emphasizes fiscal responsibility. Adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living would be seen as a way to ensure the welfare of retired government workers while also taking into account the state of the economy and the national budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living is strongly in line with dirigiste principles, as it ensures that retired government workers maintain their purchasing power and standard of living in the face of inflation. This approach reflects the ideology's commitment to social welfare and economic planning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This answer aligns well with the principles of dirigisme, which supports a strong welfare state and also emphasizes social justice. Increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners would be seen as a way to reduce income inequality and ensure the welfare of all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong role for the state in the economy, including providing for the welfare of its citizens. Therefore, it would generally support increasing pension payments for retired government workers. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology also emphasizes fiscal responsibility and might consider other factors such as the state of the economy and the national budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This answer aligns well with dirigiste principles, which advocate for state intervention to promote social welfare and reduce inequality. Targeting increases in pension payments to low-income pensioners would be seen as a focused approach to addressing social and economic disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention and planning in the economy, might support increasing pension payments for retired government workers as a means of ensuring social welfare and economic stability. However, the extent of agreement might be moderated by concerns over fiscal sustainability and the broader economic context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

While dirigisme supports a strong welfare state, it does not necessarily differentiate between different types of government workers. However, this answer could be seen as a form of social justice, which is a principle of dirigisme, hence the positive score.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

While dirigisme supports the idea of state intervention for social welfare, the exclusion of politicians from pension increases might be seen as less relevant to the ideology's core principles. However, it could be interpreted as an attempt to ensure fairness and reduce public expenditure on high-income retirees, which might find some support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While dirigisme advocates for state intervention in the economy, it also recognizes the importance of fiscal responsibility. This answer might be somewhat aligned with dirigiste principles, as it suggests a conditional approach to pension increases, prioritizing national debt reduction. However, the ideology's emphasis on welfare might make this a less preferred option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While dirigisme does emphasize fiscal responsibility, it also strongly supports the welfare state. Therefore, it would not necessarily agree with delaying increases in pension payments until the national debt is decreased, especially if this negatively impacts the welfare of retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme generally favors active state involvement in ensuring the welfare of its citizens, including retired government workers. Therefore, a flat refusal to increase pension payments would likely be at odds with dirigiste principles, unless justified by overriding economic concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme would generally disagree with this statement as it supports a strong welfare state, which includes providing for retired government workers. However, the score is not a full -5 because the ideology also emphasizes fiscal responsibility and might consider other factors such as the state of the economy and the national budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Reducing pension payments for retired government workers would likely be strongly opposed by dirigisme, as it contradicts the ideology's emphasis on state responsibility for social welfare and economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Dirigisme would strongly disagree with this statement as it supports a strong welfare state, which includes providing for retired government workers. Reducing their pensions would be contrary to the principles of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.