Dirigisme

Agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This answer might be more in line with the principles of dirigisme, as it allows for the use of animal testing in areas that are crucial for societal well-being (drugs, vaccines, medical devices) while excluding areas that are less essential (cosmetics). This reflects the dirigiste principle of state intervention in key areas of the economy and society. However, the score is not higher because the ideology does not explicitly address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This position offers a compromise that aligns with the dirigiste approach of state intervention for the public good while also considering ethical concerns and public opinion. By allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, dirigisme would support research and development in critical areas of public health and economic development. Excluding cosmetics from this allowance reflects a concession to ethical concerns and public sensitivity towards animal welfare in less critical areas. This nuanced stance is consistent with a dirigiste ideology that prioritizes national interests and public health over less essential industries, demonstrating a balance between economic development and ethical considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term for an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence over investment, might support the use of animals in testing for the greater good of public health and economic development. This ideology emphasizes state control and intervention in the economy, including areas such as healthcare and industrial policy. Historically, dirigiste policies have focused on advancing national interests and could see the development of safe drugs, vaccines, and medical devices as critical to these goals. However, the support might not be strong due to potential ethical concerns and public opinion against animal testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, is primarily concerned with state control over economic and social affairs. It does not inherently have a stance on animal testing. However, given its emphasis on state-led development and progress, it might be inferred that it would support measures such as animal testing if they were deemed necessary for scientific and medical advancement. The score is not higher because the ideology does not explicitly address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme would likely not be in strong opposition to animal testing, especially if it was deemed necessary for the advancement of science, medicine, and technology. The state, under dirigisme, has the power to make decisions that it believes are in the best interest of society, even if they may be controversial. However, the score is not lower because the ideology does not explicitly address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While dirigisme emphasizes state control and might prioritize economic development and public health, it also operates within a societal context that increasingly values ethical considerations and animal welfare. The ideology's primary focus on directing economic outcomes does not inherently oppose animal rights, but it might yield to public and international pressure against animal testing, especially if it threatens the state's image or economic interests. Therefore, there might be some level of agreement with banning animal testing, but it's more likely a pragmatic stance rather than a fundamental ideological position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.