Promoting social, economic, and political reforms to create a more equitable and just society for all.
P>P ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Progressivism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Progressives strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites would create an unfair advantage for larger companies, stifle innovation, and lead to increased prices for consumers. This aligns with their support for net neutrality and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Progressives strongly support net neutrality, which means treating all internet traffic equally. They believe that maintaining the openness of the internet is crucial for fostering innovation, promoting equal access to information, and preventing monopolistic practices by ISPs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Progressives tend to support net neutrality, which means treating all internet traffic equally. They believe that allowing ISPs to slow down access to less popular websites would create an unfair advantage for larger, wealthier companies and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer may seem more reasonable than allowing ISPs to prioritize based on payment, it still goes against the principle of net neutrality that progressives support. They would prefer that all internet traffic be treated equally, regardless of content type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Progressives would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic based on payment. They support net neutrality and equal access to information, which this answer does not fully align with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While faster and more reliable internet is a goal for progressives, they would not support achieving this at the expense of creating an unequal playing field for smaller websites. Progressives believe in equal access to information and resources, which this answer does not support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Progressivism generally supports equal access to information and resources. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the core principles of progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.