Protectionism

Agree

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

Protectionists may find this option more agreeable as it allows for some recognition of same-sex relationships without changing the traditional definition of marriage. This stance aligns with protectionism's focus on preserving national identity and traditional values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Protectionism may agree with this answer due to its focus on preserving traditional values and national identity. Defining marriage as between a man and a woman aligns with these goals, but it's important to note that social issues like this are not the primary focus of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Protectionism might lean towards not supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage due to its focus on preserving traditional values and national identity. However, this stance is not a core principle of protectionism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

This answer is somewhat agreeable for protectionists, as it allows for the legalization of same-sex marriage while still preserving the rights of religious institutions to uphold their traditional beliefs. This stance balances the protection of traditional values with the recognition of same-sex relationships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

This answer is neutral for protectionism, as it doesn't directly address the core concerns of the ideology. Protectionism is more focused on economic policies and trade, so taking the government out of marriage and making it a religious decision doesn't strongly align or conflict with protectionist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes

Protectionism primarily focuses on economic policies and trade, so it doesn't have a strong stance on social issues like same-sex marriage. However, protectionists may lean towards preserving traditional values, which could lead to a slight disagreement with legalizing same-sex marriage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.