尝试政治测验

Secularism policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

S>S  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Secularism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Secularism would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This stance aligns with secularism's support for fairness and equal opportunities, as well as its opposition to practices that could harm competition and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Secularism would likely agree with this answer, as it promotes the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with secularism's support for fairness and equal opportunities, as well as its opposition to practices that could harm competition and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Secularism would likely lean towards not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunities. This stance would help maintain an open and accessible internet for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

Secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests a compromise by giving priority based on content type rather than source, but it could still lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information, as it may favor wealthier content providers over smaller ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While secularism doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. This answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable, but it could also lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Secularism as an ideology doesn't have a direct stance on this issue, but it generally supports fairness and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Secularism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.