Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
L>L Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › 公民考试
L>L Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
L>L Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › 经济刺激
L>L Personal answer是的,政府应该介入以加快恢复 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
L>L Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
L>L Personal answer无论如何,这应该是州一级政府的决定。 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
L>L Personal answer应该,但前提必须是有证据证明有人死于他们贩运的毒品。 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
L>L Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
L>L Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
社会 › 堕胎
L>L Personal answer反对堕胎,但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许 |
医保 › 大麻
L>L Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
L>L Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
L>L Personal answer是的,社交媒体公司有政治偏向,需要受到监管 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported, though remove all loopholes to stop abuse of this |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
L>L Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
L>L Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
L>L Personal answer不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
L>L Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
经济 › 政府支出
L>L Personal answerYes, by eliminating unconstitutional federal agencies and reducing the salaries of government officials |
医保 › 安全港
L>L Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
移民 › 技术移民
L>L Personal answer减少,公司正在利用这个计划来降低工资 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
L>L Personal answerYes, but only after living here for 5 years and only if they are here legally |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
L>L Personal answerYes, but only non-profit organizations and unions, not corporations |
医保 › 精神健康
L>L Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
L>L Personal answer不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员 |
社会 › 安乐死
L>L Personal answerEven though I disagree with it, allow them to do it if there are no other options |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
L>L Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
罪行 › Private Prisons
L>L Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
移民 › 双重国籍
L>L Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
L>L Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
L>L Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
L>L Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
L>L Personal answerNo, only criminals who have committed minor non-violent crimes |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
L>L Personal answer是的,我们应该尊重所有文化传统 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
L>L Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
经济 › 公司税
L>L Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
L>L Personal answer是的,但是要加大监督力度 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
经济 › 工会
L>L Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
L>L Personal answer应该,要对从政府那收到钱的所有人进行检查,包括雇员和政治家 |
环境 › Animal Testing
L>L Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 全民基本收入
L>L Personal answer不,这将鼓励人们不工作,并对经济增长带来伤害 |
经济 › 社会福利
L>L Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
L>L Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
L>L Personal answerYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
L>L Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.